Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 01:05:18 +0900 From: Yoshihiro Koya <Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: dillon@earth.backplane.com, david@catwhisker.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng Message-ID: <20010603010518C.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200106012318.f51NI8w38590@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200106020823.f528N5O98998@earth.backplane.com> <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: time_t definition is worng Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:52:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20010602085237.A73968@dragon.nuxi.com> > Since on IA-32 int == long, the only issue is what ones uses in printf() > and scanf(). I have not seen anyone having a problem with this yet. Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27757 and the response to this PR. I have no good idea to fix this problem. If someone decide what is the best for time_t, I can submit patch to solve this PR and the problem pointed out by its response. koya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010603010518C.koya>