Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:57:40 -0400 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: Sascha Schumann <sascha@schumann.cx> Cc: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poll(2)'s arbitrary limit Message-ID: <20010617155740.O1832@superconductor.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106172146470.6072-100000@rossini.schumann.cx>; from sascha@schumann.cx on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:53:59PM %2B0200 References: <20010617153129.N1832@superconductor.rush.net> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106172146470.6072-100000@rossini.schumann.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Sascha Schumann <sascha@schumann.cx> [010617 15:54] wrote: > > > As far as raising the amount of pollable entries, can you try your > > app with your kernel recompiled to accept 2xNO_FILE and 2xFD_SETSIZE > > and let us know if that solves your problem? > > I've been using kern.maxproc=kern.maxprocfiles=2*32768 for my > tests and that worked successfully. Ok, so then we don't need to change FreeBSD? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010617155740.O1832>