Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:12:36 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: "Antoine Beaupre (LMC)" <Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Richy Kim <richy@apple.com>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Subject: Re: packagetool.tcl Message-ID: <20010619161234.Q65489@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B2FAA21.4020307@lmc.ericsson.se>; from Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:38:09PM -0400 References: <XFMail.010619114442.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <3B2FAA21.4020307@lmc.ericsson.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:38:09PM -0400, Antoine Beaupre (LMC) (Antoine.Beaupre@ericsson.ca) wrote: > Yes. Also, as Will mentionned, OP does not have a lot done, and it's > doing stuff more on a common ports dir anyways. Exactly. I wouldn't say we don't have a lot done, but that's relatively true. > I think supporting the old package format will somehow be mandatory, or > it will create total panic. Absolutely. I think having a little subroutine in libh to "convert" the old package format to the new would be a good idea. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010619161234.Q65489>