Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 09:31:41 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? Message-ID: <200107081531.f68FVfU90366@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Jul 2001 16:34:52 %2B0200." <xzplmlzsd4j.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes: >> Setting undolevels=0 causes vim to have the same undo/redo behaviour as >> vendor vi and nvi. > >Nope, nvi has multiple undo levels (not sure how many), press '.' >after pressing 'u' to undo additional levels. I'm forced to use VIM under Linux and personally think that VIM just doesn't cut it. :split instead of :E, the funky undo behavior, the format of the status line, etc, etc. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107081531.f68FVfU90366>