Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:55:23 -0400 From: Charles Shannon Hendrix <shannon@widomaker.com> To: "Freebsd-Advocacy (E-mail)" <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20010719105522.B23021@widomaker.com> In-Reply-To: <9B9CB6555E6BA049BC2B857E7711C24F2A051B@puke.reno.oemsupport.com> References: <9B9CB6555E6BA049BC2B857E7711C24F2A051B@puke.reno.oemsupport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 07:36:18AM -0700, Patrick Calkins wrote: > Boy-o-boy! Somebody had better let pair networks (www.pair.com) know about > the stability issues with FreeBSD, and fast! Because it looks like they have > a *lot* of work ahead of them in changing all those machines to something > more reliable...like maybe NT?? LOL!!! I don't think we should assume that they mean reliability when they say stability. For all we know, they could mean they think FreeBSD is changing a lot right now, and so they want to wait for a 5.x release. It's not uncommon for companies to make decisions like this, wether it makes any sense or not. -- "Consulting wouldn't be what it is today without Microsoft Windows" -- Chris Pinkham ________________________________________________________________ s h a n n o n @ w i d o m a k e r . c o m To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719105522.B23021>