Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:07:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/alpha dokern.sh Message-ID: <20010721120709.A98665@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010721205905.A19446@freebie.xs4all.nl>; from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl on Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:59:05PM %2B0200 References: <200107211738.f6LHckO97874@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010721195231.A18836@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20010721111928.A97882@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010721204314.A19196@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20010721115412.A98367@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010721205905.A19446@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:59:05PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > We would actually like to support these machines in 5.0. *Especially* > > > > since we'll have working SMP. In light of that, do you still feel we > > > > should remove Turbolaser support? > > > > > > From the *floppy* yes. Not in a generic sense. .. > Depends what TL you have. Some have a fd, some don't (like the AS8400 > I 'have'). All of them have a CD drive. So axing the TL from the floppy > is not an issue. At the moment, we use the floppy install kernel as the bootable CD kernel also. So we don't have the granularity of removing support for something from just one or the other. I am working with JKH on growing that support however. > I know, but I would even support dropping the Turbochannel boxes altogether. I actually was going to draft a letter to freebsd-alpha to test the waters on that today. :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010721120709.A98665>