Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:48:43 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@sneakerz.org>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h Message-ID: <20010722184843.A1582@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <5ld76sh2qg.fsf@assaris.sics.se>; from assar@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:07:51AM %2B0200 References: <assar@FreeBSD.org> <200107230058.f6N0wig12579@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20010722200226.J49508@sneakerz.org> <5ld76sh2qg.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:07:51AM +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote: > atexit(3)? But I think this is a rather moot point since these > functions exist in lots of programs and it's better to have them in a > library. Which programs? At this point I am also against this for the code-reading + creaping-nonportable-featurism reasons Brian brought up. Also please realize that there is only a small group of committers that actively read freebsd-audit. If you are bringing in new interfaces like this freebsd-arch is the right list for that. Discussing the need in freebsd-audit for merit before posting to freebsd-arch is of course a useful thing. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010722184843.A1582>