Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:32:20 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net> Cc: FreeBSD-PORTS <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: How to tell when BUILD vs. RUN_DEPENDS is appropriate/more appropriate Message-ID: <20010731093220.A16762@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20010730201214.O82760@johncoop>; from jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:12:14PM -0700 References: <20010730201214.O82760@johncoop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:12:14PM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > Now, LIB_DEPENDS is (usually) pretty easy--if a port needs a library > that's not already on the system, one is really going to know it when > the linker fails. But differentiating between a BUILD_DEPENDS and a > RUN_DEPENDS seems to be a much grayer area. How to resolve this such > that not only does a port build correctly, but bento doesn't also > complain about what appears to be the entire tree for python or perl > not being in the pkg-plist. I am not sure I follow you here. Perl is in the base system, is not it? \Anton. -- May the tuna salad be with you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010731093220.A16762>