Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:24:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Pandurangi Venkatesh-AVP028 <venkatesh.pandurangi@motorola.com> Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Does anybody noticed TCP checksum problem while tunneling? Message-ID: <20010810162416.A41089@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <796456A0F96AD511A0AC009027B0F7412D0782@IL27EXM08.cig.mot.com>; from venkatesh.pandurangi@motorola.com on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 04:32:20PM -0500 References: <796456A0F96AD511A0AC009027B0F7412D0782@IL27EXM08.cig.mot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 04:32:20PM -0500, Pandurangi Venkatesh-AVP028 wrote: > Hello, > > We are using a CMU mobile IPv4 code, for enhancing the Mobile IPv4 functions > on a FreeBSD platform. We are seeing some problems related to TCP checksum, > when a TCP packet is encapsulated (IP in IP) and sent from CN (Correspondent > Node) to MN (Mobile Node) via FA (Foreign Agent). Sounds more likely to be a problem with the Mobile IPv4 code. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7dG0fWry0BWjoQKURAg0TAJ4vxZS9WVw3eUItuDFc0YY1G4c1zACgrtax QUC7RWH1AiWLpYTbV7EPWzY= =C8sw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010810162416.A41089>