Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:57:31 -0700 From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD hackers list <FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org>, nik@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports Message-ID: <200108251457.f7PEvVW45896@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20010825083659.A51201@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20010824174016.A45724@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241605.f7OG5GW49491@intruder.bmah.org> <20010824190806.A46103@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241725.f7OHPfB50419@intruder.bmah.org> <20010824194405.A46482@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108241752.f7OHqox51679@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825001408.B47203@freebie.xs4all.nl> <200108242311.f7ONBIt56794@intruder.bmah.org> <20010825083659.A51201@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1609954004P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
[Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.]
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > The DS10 is now rolling tarballs (with NODOC=YES) so that make release
> > > appears to have run OK. I can try (overnight) a new make release without
> > > the NODOC and see what tomorrow morning gives me.
> > >
> > > If that proves OK I think I put the resulting .iso up for download.
> >
> > That'll be good to see.
>
> ===> Installing for sgmlformat-1.7
> ===> sgmlformat-1.7 depends on executable: onsgmls - not found
> ===> Verifying install for onsgmls in /usr/ports/textproc/openjade
> >> No directory for onsgmls. Skipping..
Oh heck. Alphas build docs with openjade, not jade. We forgot to deal
with that in the definition of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS}, so release builds
containing docs but not a ports tree will break on the Alpha.
OK. Can you apply the following patch to Makefile.inc.docports? It's
against HEAD but it should apply equally well to RELENG4 because the
files (modulo CVS strings) are identical.
Due to the point in the release build where it matters, I think you can
just patch your /usr/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports (i.e. it doesn't
need to be checked in for the chroot area build).
If this works, feel free to commit to HEAD (and with re's approval,
RELENG_4). I'll be off-line for at least the next 12 hours.
> Guess: some of the ports has changed(???). It is really not a lot of fun
> to be dependent on so much ports that are in flux when trying to build a
> release
No...we just forgot this aspect of the Alpha docs build. People who
build releases with full ports should be fine.
Sorry about that...
Bruce.
PS. I just did this patch 10 minutes after waking up, no caffine yet.
Your mileage may vary.
Index: Makefile.inc.docports
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 Makefile.inc.docports
--- Makefile.inc.docports 2001/08/14 22:31:27 1.6
+++ Makefile.inc.docports 2001/08/25 14:49:01
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular \
ports/textproc/html \
ports/textproc/iso8879 \
- ports/textproc/jade \
ports/textproc/libxml2 \
ports/textproc/libxslt \
ports/textproc/linuxdoc \
@@ -44,3 +43,8 @@
ports/textproc/sgmlformat \
ports/www/links \
ports/www/tidy
+.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha"
+MINIMALDOCPORTS+= ports/textproc/openjade
+.else
+MINIMALDOCPORTS+= ports/textproc/jade
+.endif
--==_Exmh_-1609954004P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001
iD8DBQE7h7za2MoxcVugUsMRAkN0AJ91SVr4aWK5NKWfGAk26es3YYrwpgCgxpXa
3hIwB3W80ruY22Ky2Ohhb8g=
=GmWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1609954004P--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108251457.f7PEvVW45896>