Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:23:42 +0100 From: Ceri <ceri@techsupport.co.uk> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why, this is new (and BAD, BAD, BAD!!) ... Message-ID: <20010912132342.A29109@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010912121458.CAA1B37B401@hub.freebsd.org>; from jmb@hub.freebsd.org on Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:14:58AM -0700 References: <20010911110508.A22305@shaft.techsupport.co.uk> <20010912121458.CAA1B37B401@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:14:58AM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler said:
>
> yes it is BAD that your machine claims to be:
> cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
> when
> that name resolves to 10.5.4.106
That name only resolves to 10.5.4.106 because it has to, otherwise I
cannot mail the list. Read the rest of the thread.
> why not use cabletel1.cableol.net (194.168.3.4) on the helo line?
> why does the box claim to be what it is not?
Because that's the IP address of the firewall.
Read the rest of the post you just replied to.
Also, I officially pronounced this thread dead about 4 hours ago.
Can we leave it that way, please ?
Ceri
--
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010912132342.A29109>