Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:12:04 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?David_Sieb=F6rger?= <drs-stable@rucus.ru.ac.za> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sdflkj Message-ID: <20011004111204.A7847@rucus.ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <20011004085957.A22436@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk>; from ceri@techsupport.co.uk on Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 08:59:57AM %2B0100 References: <04e601c14c68$8ce4a8f0$0a01a8c0@den2> <3BBBAA54.7BC9F865@tenebras.com> <20011004085957.A22436@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2001-10-04 (08:59), Ceri wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:16:20PM -0700, Michael Sierchio said: > > > > My apologies. My ISP's absolute refusal to delegate reverse entries > > for my domain and /29 net is the problem. They gave me CNAME entries > > instead of PTR records > > Umm, you can't delegate reverse DNS for a /29 _without_ using CNAMEs. Not true. While the use of CNAMEs is suggested by RFC 2317, NS records can be used too. The technique is described at: http://homepages.tesco.net./~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html -- David Siebörger drs-stable@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011004111204.A7847>