Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:06:01 -0700
From:      Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
To:        John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: XFree86 depend on pth...
Message-ID:  <20011004160601.E95453@rand.tgd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20011004155841.E4193@johncoop.MSHOME>; from "john_m_cooper@yahoo.com" on Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at = 03:58:41PM
References:  <20011004144849.A95453@rand.tgd.net> <20011004155841.E4193@johncoop.MSHOME>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > 	What's the possibility of having XFree86 depend on the pth 
> > library?  I've been bitten many times by not having pth installed when
> > 
> > compiling its libs.  If I don't hear any reason not to I'd like to 
> > submit a PR and see this changed if possible.  -sc
>
> Native "pthreads" work quite well with XFree already (and with Mesa). 
> Using pth would break just about every other port that uses "native"
> pthreads.  I see no benefit and much pain on such a project.

Hmm.... I hate to sound nieve, but are those installed via a port?  If
so, which one?  I was doing an upgrade of cvsup with the GUI and I was
getting link errors with the x libs because they weren't compiled with
pthreads.  Installing pth then recompiling xfree86-libs has fixed this
problem in every case in the past and hasn't broken a port that I'm
aware of (this also fixed my faces compile problem too: see PR for
ports/mail/faces for more details).  Any thoughts?  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011004160601.E95453>