Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:48:29 -0500 From: Henrik Hudson <lists@rhavenn.net> To: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <mekanix@privat.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firewall not logging Message-ID: <200110171456.f9HEuoi58384@ashram.rhavenn.net> In-Reply-To: <20011016111536.VWHS23247.fepA.post.tele.dk@there> References: <20011016085031.ZUFR22989.fepB.post.tele.dk@there> <20011016020733.F293@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011016111536.VWHS23247.fepA.post.tele.dk@there>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
They should be: $fwcmd add allow ip from #YOURIPADDRESSHERE# to any via lo0 $fwcmd add allow ip from #YOURIPADDRESSHERE# to any via xl0 On Tuesday 16 October 2001 06:18, you wrote: > On Tuesday 16 October 2001 11:07, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > # Allow all data from my network card and localhost. Make sure you > > > # change your network card (mine was fxp0) before you reboot. :) > > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via xl0 > > > > All traffic is being passed by these two rules. Neither of these rules > > log. None of the log rules that are below this are ever reached. > > Hmm, I've got this from > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/dialup-firewall/rules.h >tml with a few modifications. > > I'm not very well versed into ipfw, but I think the idea here is that > trafic behind the wall should go unhindered. Should I substitue "via" with > "out xmit" instead? Just commenting those to lines out would propably give > me a lot of headaches. > > Bjarne > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110171456.f9HEuoi58384>