Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:50:23 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: Randell Jesup <rjesup@wgate.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c Message-ID: <20011018225023.B41916@tara.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <0000157003191707d1@[192.168.1.4]>; from rjesup@wgate.com on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:40:19AM -0400 References: <200110110851.f9B8ptf60343@freefall.freebsd.org><20011011112527.A54224@coffee.q9media.com><20011011154203.C44561@dragon.nuxi.com><20011013143225.B4527@ns2.freenix.org><20011013172706.A53976@dragon.nuxi.com><20011014160303.A22301@ns2.freenix.org><20011014194232.A50125@dragon.nuxi.com><00005ba2015f4b07d1@[192.168.1.4]> <0000157003191707d1@[192.168.1.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Randell Jesup: > So, do we really have problems with 16k/4k/64? If so, let's fix the > problems. I don't know really if we have problems with something other than a 8:1 ratio but 4k is too big IMO and wastes too much space. > Or should we reduce the defaults to 16k/2k? If so, what about existing > FS's with these values? If values above that are broken, should we > disable them in newfs, or at least print a warning? I'm all for 16/2k regardless of the FS size. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011018225023.B41916>