Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:51:11 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cu(1) (Was: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist) Message-ID: <200110260851.f9Q8pBY43357@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20011026032641.A27035@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 03:26:42 %2B0400." References: <20011026032641.A27035@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 16:13:11 -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > Not sure about other dirs with the same damage (0755) by recent commit. > > They are uucp family dirs. Probably we don't need to keep them all, only > needed by 'cu'. If we are keeping uucp junk around for cu(1), why is cu(1) not a port? Alternatively, what are the desirable features of cu(1) that tip(1) really needs to be able to do? M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110260851.f9Q8pBY43357>