Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 20:04:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: void <float@firedrake.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syslogd and kqueue Message-ID: <20011026200436.A61058@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20011026233957.A9925@parhelion.firedrake.org>; from float@firedrake.org on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:39:57PM %2B0100 References: <20011026233957.A9925@parhelion.firedrake.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:39:57PM +0100, void wrote: > If syslogd used the kqueue interface, I believe it could open a new log > file as soon as it was created, rather than waiting to receive a signal. > Would this be worth doing, or would it be too big a divergence from the > traditional behavior? I assume you mean "as soon as the configuration file is modified"? That would be a big violation of POLA. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE72iREWry0BWjoQKURAnk7AJ9716jp/jSMOHXThxVP6ZesvQPkjACgo7td 2Zx1SuMHEwhVTZSLJMYrgoA= =7YkL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026200436.A61058>