Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 03:13:21 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, current@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ouch -- the second controller on Promise-66 is not detected! Message-ID: <20011031031320.A41539@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20011031025742.C39765@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200110302149.f9ULnpW04142@aldan.algebra.com> <20011030225717.87F2339F0@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20011031025742.C39765@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:57:42 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 14:57:17 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > date: 2000/05/26 13:59:05; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +8 -13 > > If devclass_alloc_unit() is called with a wired unit #, and this is > > buzy, only search upwards for a free slot to use.. > > > > This broke unit numbering on ATA systems where PCI attached controllers > > come before the mainboard ones... > > This need to be resolved somehow else, not by using next free slot causing > multiply consoles, keyboards, etc. detected (with panic). Probably upper > level numbering code, i.e. ATA needs to detect its conflicts, not bus > numbering code itself. Giving more details: ATA code must test wired slot, and, if it is busy, increase number to next free slot and give it to bus code afterwards. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011031031320.A41539>