Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:30:01 -0800 (PST) From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/31229: new port: astro/linux-setiathome-i686 Message-ID: <200111210230.fAL2U1084437@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/31229; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/31229: new port: astro/linux-setiathome-i686 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:26:55 +1100 On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 12:10:02PM -0700, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/31229; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> > To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ports/31229: new port: astro/linux-setiathome-i686 > Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 21:02:46 +0200 (CEST) > > here is the master/slave port version of linux-setiathome-i686. > it seems to install/deinstall well. unfortunately, I can't test > it since I only have a P166... I euh.. I honestly don't like the link between the two packages. I agree that they could be linked together, because they're both coming from the same source and are the same kind of application. But because of the possibilities of having unsynced versions (for example for MacOS/X they are at version 3.05 while the rest of the world is at 3.03) I would prefer it to keep the two ports seperated. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111210230.fAL2U1084437>