Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:53:57 -0500
From:      Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4?
Message-ID:  <20011206115357.B71848@espresso.q9media.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011206081059.A58740@ussenterprise.ufp.org>; from bicknell@ufp.org on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:10:59AM -0500
References:  <20011205085750.I28101-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <200112052142.fB5LgVM53167@apollo.backplane.com> <3C0EF953.54CF24DB@mindspring.com> <3C0F0803.7010506@viasoft.com.cn> <3C0F0D02.8AEA9E48@mindspring.com> <20011206081059.A58740@ussenterprise.ufp.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> writes:
> The problem with GENERIC is it is the lowest common denominator.
> While it's really cool we can still boot on a 386 with 4 meg of
> RAM, making the compromises to make that happen is not terribly
> useful.

386 support has been removed from -CURRENT.  -CURRENT also doesn't
support 486SX's out of the box, one is required to load a kernel
module from the loader if they need FPU emulation.

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011206115357.B71848>