Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Dec 2001 15:59:28 -0500
From:      dochawk@psu.edu
To:        "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>
Cc:        "Dominic Marks" <dominic_marks@btinternet.com>, "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy@karlsbakk.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: in-kernel web server??? 
Message-ID:  <200112162059.fBGKxSK11049@fac13.ds.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:48:22 %2B0100." <001101c18662$3db42e20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
anthony admitted,

> Dominic writes:

> > Services should be in the userland, putting them
> > in the kernel is just stupid.

> I agree.  The more userland services you put into the kernel, the less
> stable and secure the kernel becomes.

> If Linux really does have an in-kernel HTTP server, that gives me one more
> reason to be glad I picked FreeBSD.

Linux proper doesn't do this.    Tux is a massive patch, sold by redhat 
as a product of its own.

hawk


-- 
What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\   ASCII ribbon campaign
dochawk@psu.edu  Smeal 178  (814) 375-4700           \ /   against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of                   X    and postings. 
Penn State until it pays my retainer.                / \   



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112162059.fBGKxSK11049>