Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 18:39:28 -0600 From: Steve Price <steve@freebsd.org> To: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, arch@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? Message-ID: <20011231183928.F37696@bsd.havk.org> In-Reply-To: <20011231162222.V2286@windriver.com>; from murray@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:22:22PM -0800 References: <20011231174113.O16101@elvis.mu.org> <XFMail.011231154319.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20011231162222.V2286@windriver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:22:22PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > I agree that we should make the switch in -STABLE immediately after > FreeBSD 4.5 is released. Every other x86 Unix I've been exposed to > has been using X4 for over a year. The arguments about older > supported hardware do not hold water any more since X4 supports so > many newer chipsets out of the box that X336 can't handle. All of the recent package builds have been with XFREE86_VERSION=4. I'm not sure how long for sure but for as long as I can remember which isn't saying much. Making it the default shouldn't be all that difficult in bsd.port.mk. Don't know how hard it would be for sysinstall and friends. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011231183928.F37696>