Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:31:10 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make(1) enhancement - an 'environment processor' option Message-ID: <20020106233110.K314@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20020106222342.GA76079@voi.aagh.net>; from tom.hurst@clara.net on Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:23:42PM %2B0000 References: <20011225202925.F304@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20020106222002.E314@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20020106222342.GA76079@voi.aagh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:23:42PM +0000, Thomas Hurst wrote: > * Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote: > > > No feedback on this proposed change to make(1)? :) > > Personally I think this is something that should be handled by ports > rather than make; can it's functionality not be added to bsd.port.mk or > so? As I wrote in my reply to Mark Valentine's mail, I personally do not think it can be easily added to bsd.port.mk without some *really* ugly and error-prone code and *lots* of invocations of other programs. Everybody, feel free to prove me wrong :) G'luck, Peter -- What would this sentence be like if pi were 3? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020106233110.K314>