Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:20:46 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.sparc64 disktab rc.sparc64 ttys Message-ID: <20020108210906.T4770-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.020108003445.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 08-Jan-02 Bruce Evans wrote: > > Disks aren't machine-dependent, so the disktab files should be uncloned, > > not cloned. The old ones are identical except for different bitrot > > in them: > > alpha version: missing minimum3 and orb2200 relative to i386 version; > > orb2200 probably shouldn't exist > > ia64 version: missing zip250 relative to the alpha version; zip250 > > certainly shouldn't exist > > I agree, would you rather we have a single disktab then? Yes. We could also delete some old cruft from it. Who would want a 100MB IDE disk? Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020108210906.T4770-100000>