Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:44:51 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux moves to per CPU run queues Message-ID: <20020111094451.C42285@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20020110112323.F7984@elvis.mu.org> References: <3C3CF60B.CE5F3E6C@mindspring.com> <20020109203747.A86842@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3C3DE6DB.5210233E@mindspring.com> <20020110112323.F7984@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 10 January 2002 at 11:23:23 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> [020110 11:09] wrote: >> Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:01:47PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: >>>> As I have been suggesting for FreeBSD for some time, Linux has >>>> just moved to per CPU run queues to reduce scheduler contention >>>> and to improve affinity. >>>> >>>> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0201.0/0810.html >>> >>> Where are your patches? >> >> Why not commit Alfred's patches instead? I talked them over >> with him a number of times in the break room when we were >> both working at ClickArray, and they are very close (all you >> would need to do is remove the global run queue dependency he >> kept). > > My patches are leet, but no one would give them the time of day. Do you have performance measurements? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020111094451.C42285>