Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:39:19 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review Message-ID: <20020121173917.GD38390@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpbsfnvcbh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpsn8zwwey.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpbsfnwvfz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121161534.GE37234@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpu1tfvfib.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121162726.GH37234@nagual.pp.ru> <xzplmervds6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121171719.GA38390@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpbsfnvcbh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 18:33:22 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > > We can speed up pam_opie by saving one opielookup() call in this way: > > True, except you forgot to call opieunlock() :) No, when opiechallenge() return != 0, no opieunlock() needed because nothing is locked. Look at opiechallenge() sources, it not makes lock on error. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121173917.GD38390>