Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:27:47 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: will@csociety.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd2 Makefile pkg-plist ports/graphics/gd2/files Makefile.bsd Message-ID: <20020121222747.B18609@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200201220319.g0M3JAQ52976@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20020121140101.Q18609@squall.waterspout.com> <200201220319.g0M3JAQ52976@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:19:06PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Well, the reason I did this is because some stuff, actually, just
> expects to find gd.h -- not gd/gd.h (libwmf, for example, or gdtclft) --
> and needs to be patched somehow. Since all of the headers are named
> gd<something>.h too, I think, it would be proper to install them in
> include directly.
>
> This is something I meant to do for a while, and finally did today. You
> are welcome to revert it, if you strongly feel I'm incorrect...
You should have put this information in your commit log.
Regardless, such programs can easily -I${LOCALBASE}/include/gd,
whereas programs that do gd/gd.h (which I believe is the
standard way, if memory from playing around with gd from about
2-3 years ago serves) have a problem, unless you plan on
symlinking gd to . in ${LOCALBASE/include.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121222747.B18609>