Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:14 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@ptavv.es.net>, desmo@bandwidth.org, powell@astart.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very old LPRng ports in ports tree Message-ID: <20020122165439.786793FC40@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20020122163525.469705D0A@ptavv.es.net> References: <20020122163525.469705D0A@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 17:35, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> future? The ports should be trivial as both distributions are
> explicitly FreeBSD aware and install everything in the "right" places
> for the FreeBSD norms. They do an even better job than the existing
> port.
Hey, so where is your patch and your PR then? :)
> It would also be nice to see lprngtool added to the ports tree.
Grab the porters handbook and get the thing running on FreeBSD :)
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
EnergyHQ :: http://energyhq.homeip.net
FreeBSD - The power to serve!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020122165439.786793FC40>