Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:19:10 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> Cc: Yarema <yds@CoolRat.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 for ports, automaticly enable it or not? Message-ID: <20020124211910.H825@k7.mavetju.org> In-Reply-To: <yge3d0wi0np.wl@piano.mahoroba.org>; from ume@mahoroba.org on Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:00:26PM %2B0900 References: <20020123163021.A97184@k7.mavetju.org> <980340000.1011786243@volyn.coolrat.org> <20020124161554.G825@k7.mavetju.org> <yge3d0wi0np.wl@piano.mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:00:26PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:15:54 +1100 > >>>>> Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> said: > > edwin> Maybe there can come a standard entry in /etc/make.conf then, which > edwin> implies that IPv6 support is required: WITH_IPV6 for example. In > edwin> that way ports which support IPV6 have a single switch to look at > edwin> to enable IPv6. > > edwin> No WITH_IPV6, do not compile in IPv6 support in the application. > edwin> WITH_IPV6, do compile in IPv6 into the application. > > edwin> It sound logical and easy enough to do it this way, doesn't it? > > We need package. In such case, IPv6 version of package is not made. So you suggest that every package (with possible IPv6 support) will have to get two entries in the ports-collection? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020124211910.H825>