Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 22:39:13 -0500 From: Tadayuki OKADA <tadayuki@mediaone.net> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, tadayuki.okada@windriver.com, will@csociety.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/gd Makefile pkg-comment Message-ID: <20020128223913.66d286f3.tadayuki@mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <200201281248.g0SCmpQ63087@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20020126222231.1c336cf3.tadayuki@mediaone.net> <200201281248.g0SCmpQ63087@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Mikhail, On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:48:48 -0500 (EST) Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > > To Mikhail: Do you still think this is an improvement? > > Yes, I do. Unfortunately, I lost the track of your logic some time ago > and am increasingly confused by your arguments. Perhaps, you should ask > someone else to rephrase them :-\ You don't need to follow the arguments. You haven't answered this. > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 20:43:09 -0500 (EST) > Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > > The reason port A needs upgrading should not be the PORTREVISON > > somewhere, but the mere fact, that port B, for which there is a > > lib-dependency, is being upgraded. If portupgrade does not do this, it > > should -- always -- with or without my modifications. > portupgrade -r 'port B' will update 'port A' if port A's PORTREVISION is > bumped. You just blamed the tool. Do you have any practical answer for this? Regards, -- Tadayuki OKADA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020128223913.66d286f3.tadayuki>