Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:15:02 +0100 From: Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-ID: <20020207101501.A89056@fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:05AM -0500
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn wrote (2002/02/06): > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > seeing for performance when they run current. There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled in -current. -- Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020207101501.A89056>