Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 03:57:47 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: gnn@neville-neil.com Cc: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Discussion of guidelines for additional version control mechanisms (fwd) Message-ID: <20020227.035747.68512344.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <200202270840.AAA1409806@meer.meer.net> References: <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> <200202270840.AAA1409806@meer.meer.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200202270840.AAA1409806@meer.meer.net>
"George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> writes:
: The problem here is process. The FreeBSD project now has more than
: 12 core members and more than 12 committers. With any number larger
: than 12 it is VERY HARD to reach consensus on anything. Without a
: process by which we agree to reach consensus it is impossible.
There are only only 8 core team members, unless you mean something
different by "core" here than core@freebsd.org.
Otherwise, I tend to agree with your basic premise that it is process
and not tools at the heart of this problem.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020227.035747.68512344.imp>