Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:24:51 +0700 From: John Indra <maverick@office.naver.co.id> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc() and the stock Perl in -CURRENT (and -STABLE) Message-ID: <20020314132451.F8244@office.naver.co.id> In-Reply-To: <40628.1016085846@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:04:06AM %2B0100 References: <20020314104525.B8244@office.naver.co.id> <40628.1016085846@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:04:06AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >At the cost of considerable complexity (a mremap(2) implementation amongst >other things), realloc in phkmalloc(3) can be optimised but it is not >on my plate right now. Glad to know that there is no problem with malloc() in -CURRENT. But I still think that this must be addressed in Perl. So maybe, the stock Perl should be built against its own malloc library? Thank you for the clarification. /john "I go, I fight, and I win!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020314132451.F8244>