Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:47:31 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        obrien@freebsd.org, alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: (forw) per-arch __P removal done, please test review.
Message-ID:  <20020320224731.GR455@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C99095A.8C598A76@mindspring.com>
References:  <20020320181508.GG455@elvis.mu.org> <20020320101950.A65314@dragon.nuxi.com> <3C99095A.8C598A76@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> [020320 14:13] wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> Alfred has made a name for himself by tackling unpleasent
> grunt work as it comes up; so freaking what?  The:

Yah, really...

> 
> > You just want to get your name in lights don't you??
> 
> comment is really unwarranted.

Goes without saying. :)

> At a previous company, a manager got a bug up his butt that
> getting rid of LINT warnings using FlexiLint would magically
> make the code better, even though some of the casts that had
> to be there to make that happen actually hid important
> semantic conversions which constrained future use.  Making
> the code LINT cleanly hid these semantics, planting land
> mines for future programmers.
> 
> 
> Rather than shut down engineering for a week while people
> went off on this futile and (be honest) assinine exercise,
> I and one other engineer took it upon ourselves to spend a
> little over 4 hours "fixing" the code so that it LINT'ed
> cleanly, after it was announced that the company would take
> time out to "fix the LINT bugs".
> 
> Did we get some public kudos over it?  Yes.  But that was
> not the intent of the exercise.  The intent of the exercise
> was to get the LINT-harpies off the backs of the engineers
> so that the make-work of passing some idiotic tool's idea
> of what constitutes good taste didn't impact the developement
> schedule.  The public kudos in fact detracted from the point
> we were trying to make by somehow legitimizing the exercise;
> we didn't care: we hadn't lost a week to all of engineering
> diddling themselves.

Then _I_ did this:

echo CFLAGS+=-O >> /src/root/make.conf

and broke the build for them because of various things that
gcc didn't pick up without optimization turned on.

oh the joys of working there. :)

-Alfred

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020320224731.GR455>