Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:25:56 +1100 (EST)
From:      Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au>
To:        Volker Stolz <stolz@hyperion.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc:        Ian <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: idprio
Message-ID:  <20020326232510.A21338-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <20020326121046.A3952@margaux.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Volker Stolz wrote:

> Under FreeBSD system calls are currently never preempted, therefore non-
>      realtime processes can starve realtime processes, or idletime processes
>      can starve normal priority processes.

Even so an idprio process can't be worse than a normal process.

Andrew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020326232510.A21338-100000>