Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 04 Apr 2002 19:38:59 -0500
From:      "Jud " <jud@operamail.com>
To:        <culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org>, <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        <george@galis.org>, <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net>, <nl3481@wi.rr.com>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: EIDE drive performance improvements
Message-ID:  <20020405003859.29392.qmail@operamail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
    

----- Original Message -----
From: Kenneth Culver <culverk@alpha.yumyumyum.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 18:39:12 -0500 (EST)
To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Subject: Re: EIDE drive performance improvements


> > You should be able to, depending on how the controller presents itself
> > to the system.  The asr driver looks like a scsi disk to the system, and
> > can accept 255 tagged commands.  I haven't seen my array go above 60,
> > but it does work.
> >
> > --
> Yeah, but we're talking about an ATA array here, I'm not sure that it
> would work the same.

Some RAID controllers for ATA/IDE drives look like a 
single SCSI device to the system.  I don't think that's 
true of my Promise onboard chip (a software rather than a 
hardware controller), because I have no SCSI support in 
the kernel but the array works fine.

Don't think I need much more tuning anyhow - my last "make 
world" took a shade under 20 minutes.  :)

Jud
-- 

_______________________________________________
Download the free Opera browser at http://www.opera.com/

Powered by Outblaze

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020405003859.29392.qmail>