Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:09:49 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: statue@freebsd.sinica.edu.tw, esk@ira.uka.de, sada@freebsd.org, ijliao@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: latest INDEX count versus cvs Message-ID: <20020406041010.D0C633F28@bast.unixathome.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi folks, [this msg has been cc'd to the maintainers of the ports in question] A new INDEX was just committed with 6777 ports. I've just finished a reconciliation between cvs, INDEX, and FreshPorts. Here are my findings: The following ports are being pulled out of a cvsup, but are not appearing in INDEX. Does anyone have a reason why they should not be added to their respective catetgory Makefiles? chinese/cwtex devel/arm-elf-gcc31 japanese/alias-fonts math/libgmp4 math/libgmp-freebsd textproc/tclxml My count of ports based on a cvsup: 6783 INDEX shows 6777 The difference is the above 6 ports. cheers -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020406041010.D0C633F28>