Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:44:43 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is there a reason that da should *not* drive type STORAGE ARRAY Message-ID: <200204152144.g3FLih983892@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:41:26 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0204151439290.62590-100000@beppo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Whilst dorking with an HP XP-512 storage arrage array on Fibre Channel, I >found that it defaults to type STORAGE ARRAY (not DIRECT ACCESS). However, the >DIRECT ACCESS commands work fine. > >Is there a reason why da(4) should *not* drive devices of type STORAGE ARRAY? Fear of the unknown. What differentiates a STORAGE ARRAY from any other DIRECT ACCESS device? Is the assumption that they are essentially the same always valid? -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204152144.g3FLih983892>