Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:22:57 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Peter Avalos <pavalos@theshell.com> Cc: "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au>, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: df -t option Message-ID: <20020422202257.B72727@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020423001418.GA896@theshell.com>; from pavalos@theshell.com on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:14:18PM -0700 References: <20020422175047.A37860@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020423001418.GA896@theshell.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Avalos <pavalos@theshell.com> writes: > I think it should be implemented as the standard says, and move the > current -t to some other option (-T seems good). If it is done this way > I would not recommend a MFC. I believe having standard options is the > way to go. I agree. In -stable, -T could become an alias for -t, and using -t instead of -T could result in a warning noting its deprecated status. I did something similar when I added the -p option to whois(1). Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020422202257.B72727>