Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:55:16 +0000 From: George Cox <gjvc@extremis.net> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20020508185516.GB53102@beaujolais.extremis.net> In-Reply-To: <20020508075543.A5E5838CC@overcee.wemm.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020507202743.83455K-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20020508075543.A5E5838CC@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/05 00:55, Peter Wemm wrote: > > improve exposure. Do Perl applications typically hard code paths, or just > > rely on Perl to "know where to look"? > > We have several choices.. From installing a symlink pointing to wherever > the default perl package is, through to a simple redirector that searches > $PATH and/or looks in a few well-known locations. Heck, python often uses > "#! /usr/bin/env python". This works for perl scripts too. We have mailwrapper(1). How about perlwrapper(1)?! h0h0h0 best; gjvc -- [gjvc] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020508185516.GB53102>