Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 12:43:39 -0700 From: Jonathan Mini <mini@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 11120 for review Message-ID: <20020518124339.F25907@stylus.haikugeek.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20020518090335.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:03:35AM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205180424010.60393-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <XFMail.20020518090335.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin [jhb@FreeBSD.org] wrote : > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> Yes, I think that is the problem. I think it has to do with setting > >> up/tearing down the thread stacks. If uma could do this w/o holding > >> the zone locks that would probably be sufficient. > > > > The old analogy to this problem was one of the reasons that I used > > the thread_reap() command an allowed them to be torn down > > at a known safe time.. > > The fini() call out should be a safe time, I think the locking in uma > just needs to be adjusted to ensure it is safe. I think Jeff agrees as well. Jeff, are you reading this thread? -- Jonathan Mini <mini@freebsd.org> http://www.haikugeek.com "He who is not aware of his ignorance will be only misled by his knowledge." -- Richard Whatley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020518124339.F25907>