Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2002 15:18:44 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>
To:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why don't we search /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include by default?
Message-ID:  <20020529.151844.49472446.imp@village.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020529125401.C2156@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <20020528.221453.83474290.imp@village.org> <20020529140813.P82424@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020529125401.C2156@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020529125401.C2156@dragon.nuxi.com>
            "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> writes:
: On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:08:13PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
: > On Tuesday, 28 May 2002 at 22:14:53 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: > > In message: <20020529122327.C82424@wantadilla.lemis.com>
: > >             "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
: > >> I'm complaining about the implementation.  Since the Ports Collection
: > >> installs by default in /usr/local, it seems reasonable to at least put
: > >> these directories at the end of the search paths for header files and
: > >> libraries.
: > >
: > > It is working as designed.  /usr/local/* isn't searched by default,
: > > and never have been in BSD.
: > 
: > "We do it this way because our grandfathers did it this way"?
: 
: I speak English because my grandfather did.  A good enough reason for me.

Also, "If everybody were jumping off of cliffs, would you do it too?"

Add /usr/local/* by default is just a really dumb idea.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529.151844.49472446.imp>