Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:33:57 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Seeking OK to commit KSE MIII-again Message-ID: <20020531083357.C75B5380A@overcee.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpy9e0dbqc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes:
> > If you want final commit approval/objections, you really need to either
> > include or go to developers@ instead since they're the ones dealing with
> > actual commit process.
>
> s/developers/arch/
I wasn't clear with this comment. As I said elsewhere when somebody else
asked:
==
If he's looking for comments on the changes or reviews, he should go to
arch@ as that isn't really current@ material.
If he's looking for volunteers to pre-test it, then he should be asking for
testers on current@.
But he said he was asking for "permission" to commit it ("Seeking OK to
commit KSE MIII-again"), so he should be talking with other committers.
current@ is not particularly well tracked by committers themselves due to
relatively low signal to noise. At the very least, you have to tell
committers@ that you've posted about it elsewhere if you want it to be
seen.
==
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020531083357.C75B5380A>