Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Jun 2002 22:12:10 -0400
From:      Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject:   Re: Removing wait union
Message-ID:  <20020604221210.G98086@espresso.q9media.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020604163038.A67053@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 04:30:38PM -0700
References:  <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020603190818.E16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020604140957.A63493@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020604190813.D98086@espresso.q9media.com> <20020604163038.A67053@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> These are the ports which built on the last 5.0 run the other day but
> failed this time around.  There are others hidden by dependencies
> which fail to build; I can give you an updated list once things like
> XFree86 and C++ include directories get fixed.
[...]

For anyone watching this thread, I just sent Kris 15 patches for these
ports.  Most uses were far more trivial than in the base system.

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020604221210.G98086>