Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:36:28 +1000 From: "Tim J. Robbins" <tjr@FreeBSD.org> To: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/c99 index.sgml Message-ID: <20020607123628.A60618@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20020606194448.A23497@FreeBSD.ORG>; from jmallett@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 07:44:49PM -0700 References: <200206070217.g572HH584853@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020606194448.A23497@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 07:44:49PM -0700, J. Mallett wrote:
> Which essentially means: If you have patches for ps(1) wrt SUSv3 conformance,
> or want to discuss which options of ours should go in favor of SUSv3 ones that
> conflict, which should be optional, etc., speak up.
My opinion is that we shouldn't remove the traditional BSD options where
they conflict with the XSI extensions. POSIX.2 UPE conformance would be
a good thing, though.
Here is the synopsis from P1003.2a:
5.23.1 Synopsis
ps [-aA] [-G grouplist] [-o format] ... [-p proclist] [-t termlist]
[-U userlist]
We are missing -A and -G, and the -p and -o options may have other problems.
Tim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020607123628.A60618>