Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:28:39 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ru@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: recent bsd.lib.mk changes Message-ID: <20020621132839.A68827@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200206211429.33406.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com on Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:29:33PM -0400 References: <200206211429.33406.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:29:33PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I used to define INTERNALLIB to avoid building and installing the static > version, but that is now almost reversed -- only the static will be > built and nothing will be installed. The old INTERNALLIB knob was confusion and not really used. An internal lib is a static lib we create during `make world' because it reduces compile times (ie, code that is shared). I can think of very few reasons to build a .so, but not a .a. Some people do like to build static binaries. > Can the future modifications in the share/mk be, please, tested with > ports as well as src builds? Thanks! src/share/mk is for /usr/src. If /usr/ports can use the bits, that is nice. If not ports/Mk/bsd.FOO.mk should be created and used. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020621132839.A68827>