Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:51:27 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: des@ofug.org Cc: bright@mu.org, will@csociety.org, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? Message-ID: <20020622.225127.112566091.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020622200545.GS76002@squall.waterspout.com> <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> writes:
: > Not having 'startx' or having a 'startx' that doesn't work is
: > really a bad idea. It _will_ annoy users.
:
: Only users who haven't yet entered the 90s and discovered xdm.
I think this attitude is not helpful. xdm broke badly on the last set
up upgrades I did to X. startx is the only thing that still works for
me.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020622.225127.112566091.imp>