Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 19:28:03 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Matt Simerson <freebsd@blockads.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Ellard <ellard@eecs.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS server benchmarks vs. OpenBSD, NetBSD? Message-ID: <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <E2B9BDC5-851E-11D6-963B-00306553B5E4@blockads.com>; from freebsd@blockads.com on Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400 References: <3D129A60.99AA2608@mindspring.com> <E2B9BDC5-851E-11D6-963B-00306553B5E4@blockads.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:57:55AM -0400, Matt Simerson wrote: > FreeBSD has very solid NFS code in addition to being a very robust, > versatile, and downright fun operating system. It's very easy to do > everything I want to with FreeBSD. It's NFS is missing locking support > but it's very fast and works very well with FreeBSD and Mac OS X > clients. I haven't used it with anything else. Actually Matt Jacob has some NFS testsuites that makes FreeBSD servers blow chunks. Solaris still is the most robust NFS server of the general purpose UNIXes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020622192803.B20405>