Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:25:18 +1000 (Australia/ACT) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: ahl@austclear.com.au (Tony Landells) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hogwash Message-ID: <200206250625.QAA01010@caligula.anu.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <200206250556.PAA07738@tungsten.austclear.com.au> from "Tony Landells" at Jun 25, 2002 03:56:54 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Tony Landells, sie said: [...] > If you expect a volunteer group to provide you with iron-clad secure > products, or to fix any found problems instantly, I think you're being > somewhat unrealistic. [...] This *is* what they claim to do. Personally, I think their claims are unrealistic and all the hype about "software audit" is just that - hype. If the OpenSSH team are working with ISS on a fix then it seems to me that ISS found this problem, not the OpenSSH team. Why did the audit by the OpenSSH team miss this problem ? Isn't this what their code audits are meant to find - security bugs ? What benefit are we *really* getting from their "code audits" ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206250625.QAA01010>