Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:06 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Drehmel <robert@ferrari-electronic.de> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_sysvec.c Message-ID: <20020709191006.GD27690@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020709204823.A31692@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> References: <200207091459.g69ExRxg017714@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020709173323.GA24994@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020709204823.A31692@alpha.develop.ferrari.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:48:23PM +0200, Robert Drehmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:33:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Also the SVR4 compat code will be used much more by our sparc64 platform > > than i386 one -- and there it will be used exclusively for Solaris > > binaries. > > That is true -- I will back it out. Do you agree that > brandelf(1) should then be changed to brand files to > ELFOSABI_SOLARIS when "SVR4" is specified as the type? Not really -- SVR4(ELFOSABI_SVR4) is a legal type. It is also the way of "un-branding". The change you made might be right, but I think we should think about it and make sure it is a change that is a Good Thing. There is Solaris-x86 and true-blue vanilla SVR4 on i386. So maybe we might need a sys/compat/solaris that uses most of the sys/compat/svr4 code. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020709191006.GD27690>